White House changes promise more of the same - MarketWatch

By Darrell Delamaide

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) Surely it"s a coincidence. Rahm Emanuel leaves Washington to run for mayor of Chicago and Barack Obama"s political fortunes improve dramatically.

After all, the president"s record with Emanuel as chief of staff, as the White House never tires of telling us, was pretty impressive what with avoiding a financial meltdown, passing health-care reform, re-regulating (kind of) the financial sector, and all.

So it was clearly a coincidence that a lame-duck session of Congress after Emanuel left and economic adviser Larry Summers withdrew from the field brought a dam-breaking compromise on tax issues and welcome resolution on the START treaty and Sdon"t ask, don"t tell right?

Dull old Pete Rouse took over White House chief of staff duties on an Sinterim basis, and things started happening. Not to worry. Presidential confidante Valerie Jarrett hinted last week that Obama could soon appoint a Snew face as permanent chief of staff and presumably put an end to that.

Obama hasn"t had a lucky hand with staff appointments. His White House team has come under heavy criticism for being arrogant, out of touch, politically tone deaf, inept and so on.

Obama came to office nearly two years ago promising a new tone in Washington and promptly appointed one of the most confrontational and abrasive politicians in the city as his chief of staff. He promised bold new policies but made Summers, a Clintonite who backed the wholesale deregulation that led to the financial crisis, as his chief economic adviser.

So after the Sshellacking of the midterm elections, Obama recognized the error of his ways, learned humility, and resolved to make better appointments, right? Don"t count on it.

Rouse, a veteran chief of staff for former Senate majority leader Tom Daschle who also ably headed Obama"s senatorial staff, might be effective, but he"s not well, he"s just not famous enough. One pundit said she had to Google to recall who took Emanuel"s place, while MSNBC anchor Chris Mathews pleaded for Obama to appoint a Scabinet-level chief of staff like James Baker, who was President Ronald Reagan"s chief of staff before going on to become secretaries of Treasury and then State.

As for chief economic adviser, the White House seems to have recognized this post really should be filled by an economist and not a former CEO, so they"ve settled on a couple of bold new names Gene Sperling, who held that same post in the Clinton administration, and Roger Altman, a Wall Streeter and Treasury official under, yes, Bill Clinton.

The more things change ...

These choices demonstrate how sensitive White House political antennae have become, taking into account how popular Wall Street is with the voters.

Sperling, after all, while using a modest post at the Council on Foreign Relations as cover, reportedly earned a million dollars in 2008 consulting for Goldman Sachs and giving speeches to financial institutions. He"s been a special adviser to Treasury in this administration.

As for Altman, he earned his Wall Street spurs at the late Lehman Brothers before starting his own M&A boutique.

A third choice to succeed Summers is now making its way through the rumor mill: Yale University president Richard Levin. (Seems only fair, since Summers was president of Harvard).

Levin is a trained economist with special expertise in railroad deregulation still a burning issue, to be sure. Levin"s served as president of Yale since 1993, showing a pronounced economic skill for fundraising. That should help him counsel Obama on the economic challenges facing the country.

Is there really no practicing economist out there who didn"t serve in the Clinton administration who might bring some genuinely new ideas to the table? If University of Texas professor James Galbraith or Princeton University economist Paul Krugman seem too radical, what about MIT"s Peter Diamond, whose nomination to the sit on the Federal Reserve has been blocked by Republicans in the Senate? (The White House post doesn"t require confirmation.)

Who"s in charge here Clinton"s former Treasury secretary Robert Rubin, Bill Clinton himself or Barack Obama?

Meanwhile, back in the Oval Office, Chicago buddy Jarrett will be there to ensure that the coterie around Obama keeps the same openness it showed during the first two years of his term.

Chief political adviser David Axelrod will return to his beloved Chicago to do what he does better run a campaign while his replacement, David Plouffe, another of the masterminds behind Obama"s 2008 presidential run, will infuse some not-so-new blood into the West Wing.

Don"t you feel better already about the prospect for change at the White House?


READ MORE » White House changes promise more of the same - MarketWatch

Obama's moment of decision - Financial Times

It is an odd thing to say when you recall the thrashing US voters just gave the Democratic party, but Barack Obama can look back with satisfaction on his first two years in office.

Under Mr Obama"s supervision, Congress passed an enormous and necessary fiscal stimulus in double-quick time. It pushed through comprehensive healthcare reform, a goal that had eluded Democratic presidents for years. And it overhauled the country"s system of financial regulation.


READ MORE » Obama's moment of decision - Financial Times

Carlson: Vick 'should have been executed' - Seattle Post Intelligencer (blog)

Tucker Carlson hasn't forgiven Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Michael Vick.

The Fox analyst, reacting to President Barack Obama's comments on Vick, said Tuesday night that Vick deserved to die for his participation in a brutal dogfighting ring.

"Michael Vick killed dogs, and he did (it) in a heartless and cruel way," Carlson said while guest hosting Sean Hannity's show on Fox News Channel.

"I think personally he should have been executed for that."

Obama reportedly called Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie to commend him for giving Vick a second chance in the NFL.

Check out the video below.


READ MORE » Carlson: Vick 'should have been executed' - Seattle Post Intelligencer (blog)

Hawaii Governor Looking to Silence 'Birthers' by Releasing Birth Data - The Epoch Times

Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie said he wants to release more information about President Barack Obama"s birth data to prove wrong the so-called Sbirthers," who claim Obama was born somewhere else, according to a CBS report on Tuesday.

Abercrombie told CBS affiliate KGMB that people who think Obama was born in another country and thus is not truly eligible to be president of the United States, are incorrect.

According to the report, the birthers have attempted to get Hawaii to release data on the president"s birth, but that is not allowed under U.S. law. Abercrombie, a Democrat, said he will attempt to find a way to get around this hurdle to defend Obama.

"This has to do with the people in Hawaii who love him, people who loved his mom and dad," Abercrombie told the news station over the weekend. "This has to do with the respect of the office that the president is entitled to."

He said that the birthers are making claims against the president for political reasons, according to a separate report by the Los Angeles Times.

Abercrombie said he had a longterm friendship with Obama"s parents and recalled seeing Obama when he was a small child.

"He had a friendship with Mr. Obama's parents, and so there is a personal issue at hand," spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz told the Associated Press on Tuesday. "Is it going to be done immediately? No, the first thing on our list is the economy."


READ MORE » Hawaii Governor Looking to Silence 'Birthers' by Releasing Birth Data - The Epoch Times

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton "Most Admired" Americans - The Root (blog)

Obama, Hillary Clinton Are Americans' Most Admired

"President Barack Obama is Americans' Most Admired Man of 2010, substantially ahead of the former presidents, iconic religious leaders, and others who fill out the top 10 list. Obama first became Americans' Most Admired Man in 2008, shortly after his election as the nation's 44th president, and has held the title since then," Lydia Saad reported Monday for the Gallup Organization.

". . . Obama is the runaway favorite for Most Admired Man among Democrats nationwide: 46% choose him, followed by 7% who pick Bill Clinton and 5% Nelson Mandela. Obama also leads among independents, with 17%, but ranks second among Republicans behind George W. Bush."

"Hillary Clinton is the Most Admired Woman this year, her ninth consecutive year at No. 1.

"In fact, the order of the top six women named in 2010 is identical to 2009, with Sarah Palin, Oprah Winfrey, Michelle Obama, Condoleezza Rice, and Queen Elizabeth following Clinton."

Kevin Blackistone, AOL Fanhouse:�'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Needs to Resonate With Pro Sports Now

Lewis W. Diuguid, Kansas City Star:�Ability for gay troops to serve openly is a New Year"s blessing

Todd S. Purdum, Vanity Fair:�Obama Is Suffering Because of His Achievements, Not Despite Them

Sports Journalism Program Becomes a Minor at Morehouse

Four years ago, filmmaker Spike Lee raised $721,000 to begin a sports journalism program at Morehouse College, saying he believed the prominence of black athletes in sports should be equally represented in the coverage of sports.

Last week, Ron Thomas, who became the director of the Journalism and Sports Program at the college, updated members of the Sports Task Force of the National Association of Black Journalists on the progress of the program Lee envisioned.

    "In May our program, which began as a concentration in English with only one journalism course, became an 18-credit hours minor that can be taken by any Morehouse student. . . .

    "The program has grown exponentially. In its first semester in 2007, we had eight students. This semester, 45 students enrolled in our courses.

    "Students were inspired by accomplished professional journalists as guest lecturers: New York Times sports columnist Bill Rhoden, ESPN.com columnist Vince Thomas, Atlanta Journal-Constitution feature writer Rosalind Bentley, NBA basketball analyst Mike Glenn (an expert on anti-slavery activist Frederick Douglass and black athletes dating back to the early 1800s) and author Gary Pomerantz.

    "Our program helped sponsor appearances by these prominent sports figures: Olympics icon Tommie Smith in a panel discussion entitled 'Life After the Locker Room,' former NBA star Chris Webber, and Minor League Baseball President Pat O"Conner.

    "Our strategic plan, entitled 'Changing the Face of Journalism.' established these goals for 2010-2013: increasing the number of professors and support staff, keeping pace with multimedia technology, securing scholarships, helping students obtain internships and admission to graduate journalism programs, and establishing global learning opportunities. . . ."

Thomas ended by noting Lee's seed money, now pegged at $1 million, and asking for contributions. "To replenish and increase that seed money, fund-raising has been added to my duties this school year," he explained.

Haiti Story Tops With Public, Though Not With News Editors

    "Two major disasters the earthquake in Haiti and the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico captured the public"s attention more than any other major stories in 2010, but Americans also kept a consistent eye on the nation"s struggling economy," the Pew Research Center for People and the Press reported last week.

    Its report on stories that captured the public's news interest during 2010 differed somewhat from the stories' rankings in the Associated Press' annual poll of U.S. editors and news directors.

    The Haiti earthquake, for example, ranked only fifth among the editors and news directors, while the Gulf oil spill was first.

    "In mid-January, 60% of the public said they were following news about the horrific earthquake in Haiti very closely," Pew said. "In mid-July, a comparable 59% said they were following news very closely about the major oil leak in the Gulf that started with a deadly explosion on an oil rig.

    "Throughout the year, the economy the top story in both 2009 and 2008 was never far from the top of the public"s news interest. . . . According to the weekly News Interest Index survey, the public also closely tracked news about the long-running debate over health care legislation in Washington. Interest peaked at 51% following very closely in mid-March as the House passed the legislation and sent it to President Obama for his signature. And in January, a special election for a Senate seat in Massachusetts attracted unusually high interest because of its implications for the health care bill. More than a third (36%) paid very close attention to Republican Scott Brown"s victory, which dealt a temporary setback to supporters of health care legislation."

    Spanish-Language Supermarket Tabloid Folds

    "While Hispanic magazines appear to have put the worst of the effects of the recession behind them and key categories like Automotive are recovering, comes the disappointing news that [�Mira!] magazine published by American Media, Inc. is folding this month," the Media Economics Group reported Dec. 15.

    In addition, "Caf�, the Latino Lifestyle Magazine, published out of Chicago just published its last edition," Portada reported on Thursday.

    "An American Media spokesperson has confirmed to Media Economics Group that Mira its Spanish-language tabloid entertainment magazine will be folding after the December 27th issue. That issue is scheduled to hit the [newsstands] on December 17th," the Media Economics Group said.

    "Mira"s demise is a result not only of its own weakening ad sales, but also undoubtedly related to the well-publicized difficulties of its parent company this year. On November 1st, American Media announced that is was filing for bankruptcy after struggling with a heavy debt load.

    "According to HispanicMagazineMonitor data, Mira"s advertisers were primarily direct response advertisers hawking horoscope lines, apparel, diet products and supplements, jewelry, perfumes, and even bedding products."

    "Celebrating Diversity" Makes List of Tired Phrases

    "John Rentoul has revised and updated his Banned List" of overused phrases typically by journalists and it is well worth a read by writers of all kinds," Joel Gunter wrote last week for the British website Journalism.co.uk.

    Rentoul is chief political commentator for Britain's the Independent on Sunday.

    "It continues to warn against the criminal practice of turning nouns into verbs (action, disconnect, leverage, storyline, among others), as well as irritating, incomprehensible acronyms (IMO, IMHO, LOL, ROFL and so on) and tired phrases (learning curve, raising awareness, celebrating diversity)," Gunter continued.

    "Celebrating diversity" was No. 9 on the list, between "raising awareness" and "best practice."

    "Following Rentoul"s efforts, Journalisted�has turned its expert counters of all things journalistic to 2010's most overused phrases," Gunter said.

    "Writers of all kinds, beware.

      "Learning curve: 771 articles

      "Way beyond: 746 articles

      "A no-brainer: 651 articles

      "Game changer: 524 articles

      "Perfect storm: 520 articles

      "Raising awareness: 405 articles

      "Elephant in the room: 353 articles

      "Not fit for purpose: 327 articles

      "Out of the box: 229 articles

      "What"s not to like?: 206 articles"

    Follow Richard Prince on Twitter

    Facebook users: Sign up for the "Richard Prince's Journal-isms" fan page.


    READ MORE » Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton "Most Admired" Americans - The Root (blog)

    Obama makes 6 recess appointments - CNN International

    Honolulu, Hawaii (CNN) -- Taking time out from his Hawaiian vacation to assert some executive authority, President Barack Obama on Wednesday used a series of recess appointments to override Republican objections to several nominees.

    Obama used his constitutional power to appoint six people who have had their nominations pending for an average of 147 days, according to White House officials.

    White House officials said privately that Obama acted because of Republican obstruction of the nominations, which include the posts of deputy attorney general and ambassadors to Turkey, the Czech Republic and Syria.

    Senate Republican aides did not have any immediate comment on the recess appointments, which essentially allow the nominees to serve in their posts in a temporary capacity for about a year. If the nominees are not confirmed by the end of the next session of Congress, which will likely be in November or December, the post will become vacant again.

    The list includes James Cole, who was nominated to be deputy attorney general. A longtime Washington attorney, he is best known for serving as special counsel in the House ethics investigation of then-Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican. A major reason Cole's nomination had been held up was because of concerns raised by Republicans that he once had worked as an independent consultant for the insurance giant AIG.

    Other recess appointees were:

    -- Norm Eisen, for ambassador to the Czech Republic. He most recently served as special counsel inside the White House on ethical issues.

    -- Matthew Bryza, for ambassador to Azerbaijan. He is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service.

    -- Robert Stephen Ford, for ambassador to Syria. He currently works in the State Department's Office of Inspector General.

    -- Francis J. Ricciardone Jr., for ambassador to Turkey. He has served most recently as deputy ambassador and charge d'affaires at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan.

    -- William J. Boarman, for public printer of the United States. He has served as president of the Printing, Publishing & Media Workers Sector of the Communications Workers of America.

    White House officials noted that Senate Democrats have been forced to seek a supermajority of 60 votes to confirm 21 of the president's nominees because of Republican roadblocks, while former President George W. Bush only needed to seek such so-called "cloture" votes on four of his nominees in eight years.

    In all, 18 of those Obama nominees were subsequently confirmed with 60 or more votes or by voice vote in the last two years.

    Obama has now made 28 recess appointments, only five more than the 23 Bush had made at this point in his presidency, White House officials noted.

    The Obama officials also pointed out that at the end of Bush's first two years in office, there were only six nominees awaiting a Senate vote. By contrast, Obama had 79 nominees pending on the floor when the Senate adjourned last week.


    READ MORE » Obama makes 6 recess appointments - CNN International

    Bankers Still Don't Like Obama - The Business Insider

    Wall Street is still holding the same grudge they were a year ago, when Obama first began denigrating their lot. (Right around the time Blankfein said he was doing God's work.)

    The way Wall Street *still* sees it, President Barack Obama is two-faced.

    He's nice to them in private, at fundraisers, but when the public is in ear-shot, he says things like Lloyd Blankfein made me the angriest I've been all year and such.

    Wall Street banks are doing so well since the crisis (the last two years have been the best ever for Goldman, JPMorgan, Citi, and Bank of America) that you might think they'd have too much money to allow a little rhetoric to hurt their feelings.

    But nope! The bankers are still pissed.

    Bankers told POLITICO: "He whipped everyone into a frenzy against us," said one banker.

    "It's a bunch of academic lefties down there," said another.

    "You have to understand, it is very personal. He raised money from us," one executive at a top bank said. "Then he started calling us bad people. So forgive us for not wanting to buy him a drink after getting punched in the eye."

    Click here to see what Obama really thinks about Wall Street >


    READ MORE » Bankers Still Don't Like Obama - The Business Insider

    With ink barely dry on New START, fight looms over test ban treaty - MiamiHerald.com

    The latest salvo in President Barack Obama's campaign to eliminate nuclear weapons was fired Wednesday, delivered not by the administration, but by the man who presided over the collapse of America's Cold War rival.

    Mikhail Gorbachev, the president of the Soviet Union when it fell apart in 1991, called on the U.S. to ratify an accord to ban all nuclear test blasts, saying it would strengthen U.S.-led efforts to halt the spread of nuclear weapons.

    "We have seen that dialogue with even the most recalcitrant governments is possible," Gorbachev wrote in a New York Times op-ed column, apparently referring to North Korea and Iran. "Yet dialogue can work only if the United States abandons the hypocritical position of telling others what they must do while keeping its own options open."

    Gorbachev, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990, is a leading advocate of nuclear disarmament. His call for U.S. ratification of the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, foreshadows the next major battle over arms control policy following Obama's victory on Dec. 22, when the Senate ratified a new U.S.-Russia nuclear arms reduction treaty.

    Republican senators who tried to kill Obama's New START treaty are expected to mount a vigorous effort to block the test ban treaty, bolstered by the addition of five new GOP members.

    Obama pledged to "immediately and aggressively pursue U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty" in an April 2009 speech unveiling his ambitious goal of eliminating nuclear weapons.

    Senate approval requires a two-thirds vote, or 67 of the 100 members, meaning that the test ban treaty will require the support of 14 Republicans, one more than those who supported New START.

    The leading Senate opponent is the No. 2 Republican, Jon Kyl of Arizona, who argues that the U.S. can't risk relinquishing its ability to test, a contention the administration and numerous independent experts reject. Kyl, who led the bid to kill New START, also halted the Senate's first attempt to ratify the test ban treaty in 1999.

    Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has jurisdiction over international accords, predicted after the New START vote that the test ban treaty would have a difficult path to ratification. "I said months ago to the president that the test ban treaty in the current atmosphere is a very, very difficult process. A whole lot of educating has to go on," Kerry said.

    Some administration officials are less pessimistic.

    "There's always been a bloc of opponents historically to nuclear arms reduction and control in the Senate," Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller, the top U.S. arms negotiator, said on Dec. 23. "That's part of a healthy debate; it's part of a healthy process. I don't see that as a major, major issue."

    The treaty would effectively add underground nuclear tests to a 1963 ban imposed on blasts in the atmosphere, oceans and space. It would be enforced by a United Nations-run global network of more than 330 seismographs and other sensors. It's been ratified by 153 countries, but can't go into effect until it is ratified by the U.S. and other nations with nuclear programs, including China, Iran, India, Pakistan and North Korea.

    The U.S. hasn't conducted an underground test since 1992 - it had conducted more than 1,000 before then - and maintains a voluntary moratorium on testing, as do the other major nuclear powers.


    READ MORE » With ink barely dry on New START, fight looms over test ban treaty - MiamiHerald.com

    Obama to Extend Hawaiian Vacation - Wall Street Journal

    HONOLULU--President Barack Obama won't be returning to Washington until Jan. 4, extending his Hawaiian vacation by about a day after it was delayed by a busy lame-duck Congressional session.

    "After the extended lame duck and five-day delay of his trip here, he's just trying to squeeze in more time with his family before returning to Washington," Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton said Wednesday.

    Mr. Obama is vacationing in Kailua, Hawaii, and has spent much of his free time working out, playing basketball, snorkeling, spending time with family, and swinging golf clubs. He has played golf several times since he landed in Hawaii just before Christmas, enough for some to see an improvement in his game.

    "His swing looks a lot better this year," said Mark Sousa, golf professional at Mid Pacific Country Club in Kailua, after watching the president on the driving range Tuesday. He has also played golf several times at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, near where he is staying.

    The president was supposed to leave Jan. 2 but now will leave in the evening on Jan. 3, arriving in Washington on the afternoon of the 4th.


    READ MORE » Obama to Extend Hawaiian Vacation - Wall Street Journal

    CNN Poll: Plurality say Obama's policies will likely fail - CNN (blog)

    CNN Political Ticker

    President Barack Obama enters the new year with a growing number of Americans pessimistic about his policies and a growing number rooting for him to fail, according to a new national poll.

    Full poll results

    But a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday also indicates that while a majority of the public says Republican control of the House of Representatives is good for the country, only one in four say the GOP will do a better job running things than the Democrats did when they controlled the chamber.

    Sixty-one percent of people questioned in the poll say they hope the president's policies will succeed.

    "That's a fairly robust number but it's down 10 points since last December," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Twelve months ago a majority of the public said that they thought Obama's policies would succeed; now that number has dropped to 44 percent, with a plurality predicting that his policies will likely fail."

    The survey suggests that Obama's ace-in-the-hole remains his personal popularity. CNN poll numbers released last week indicate that 48 percent of all Americans approve of how Obama is handling his job as president, but the new survey puts his approval as a person at 73 percent.

    When the new Congress convenes next week, Republicans will gain control of the House. According to the poll, 51 percent say GOP control of the House is good for the country, with 42 percent saying it's bad for the nation.

    But only 26 percent say the Republicans will do a better job running the House than the Democrats did, down seven points from early last month, right after the midterm elections. Twenty-two percent say the GOP will do a worse job than the Democrats, with a majority saying there won't be much difference.

    Full Story


    READ MORE » CNN Poll: Plurality say Obama's policies will likely fail - CNN (blog)

    What Now For Prisoners At Guantanamo Bay? - AOL News

    When Congress passed the latest defense appropriations bill Wednesday, it also may have ended any chance that there will be a federal criminal trial soon for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Thirteen months after U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the key 9/11 planner would be tried for terrorism, murder and conspiracy in Lower Manhattan, Congress formally banned any such trial for the confessed al-Qaeda chief or any of the other prisoners currently held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

    Lawmakers also forbade the Pentagon transfer of the Gitmo prisoners to the United States for any other purpose, blocked Defense Department spending on the building of domestic prisons for detainees, and imposed sharp limitations on the ability of the government to transfer the detainees to other countries. Each of these new restrictions will make it measurably more difficult for the Obama administration to close the prison in Cuba. And each reduces the power and authority of the executive branch to perform a traditional function: prosecute people accused of violating federal law.

    But when President Barack Obama was asked about the closure of the prison during a press conference Wednesday afternoon, he did not mention (much less criticize) the extraordinary legislative effort undertaken to curtail the work of the Defense Department and the Justice Department in this area of terror law. Nor did he offer any details about an executive order, a draft of which is said to be circulating around the White House and Office of Legal Council, which would continue and and thus institutionalize the controversial Bush-era policy of "indefinite detention" for dozens of Gitmo prisoners. Instead, we got a holiday blend of Obama as law professor and commander in chief.

    "I think we can do just as good of a job housing [detainees] somewhere else," the president said tepidly of Gitmo before explaining why administration lawyers are striving to change the rules governing the legal treatment of the dozens of prisoners there whom officials believe can neither be tried nor released. "Releasing [those detainees] at this stage could potentially create greater danger for the American people," the president said. "That's what this team has been looking at: Are there ways for us to make sure these folks have lawyers, to make sure that these folks have the opportunity to challenge their detention, but at the same time making sure that we are not simply releasing folks who could do us grievous harm."

    Currently, 174 prisoners are at the Cuban prison. Of that number, approximately 48 are slated for "indefinite detention." The White House is said to be considering a set of rules that would grant these men far more due process rights than they received from military officials during the Bush administration. For example, they would have more access to attorneys and to some of the evidence against them. They would still be able to challenge their confinement in federal court, but they would also have to accept the verdict of quasi parole-boards staffed with officials from the military and, for the first time, from other agencies. Civil libertarians argue that none of this makes up for the "indefinite" part of these prisoner's "indefinite detention." Ultimately, the Supreme Court may have to decide.

    In any event, for the time being that leaves approximately 126 Gitmo prisoners who still may be processed and prosecuted. What to do with these men is a fundamental question that official Washington will have to ponder when the 112th Congress convenes next month. For example, will the executive branch react to the narrowing of its power by Congress? Will it seek to get around the new law? Attorney General Holder was angry earlier this month when he realized that the lawmakers were serious about blocking his ability to prosecute men like Mohammed and Ramzi Binalshibh in federal court. But can and will the Justice Department do something about it? Holder said the congressional limitations were "unwise." He did not say they were unconstitutional. At least not aloud.

    If there is a White House challenge to Congress over civilian terror trials (and I hope there is for the sake of precedent, if not principle), I suppose we'll be where we've been for the past year or so -- in unproductive stalemate. The attorney general keeps trying to remind people that hundreds of terrorists have been tried successfully in New York -- both before and after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. But there has been a hardening of views toward these trials -- coinciding with the Obama presidency, for reasons I will leave you to ponder -- and it's hard to see how Holder and Company are going to change that dynamic without a great deal of bully pulpit help from the president. And he showed very clearly on Wednesday that he does not intend to spend a great deal of his political capital on this issue. Turns out that joblessness and the economy have in the end hurt even the Gitmo detainees, too.

    That leaves us with the idea of revving up the military commissions system for Gitmo prisoners. As I have argued for nearly nine years, and as many others have more persuasively contended as well, if the administration provides these men fair tribunals there is little doubt that the results will be upheld by the Supreme Court. In other words, what crippled the Bush administration's plans to use tribunals was its short-sighted insistence upon unfair procedures that were short of the due process requirements the Supreme Court was willing to accept on behalf of the prisoners. At no point in any of the great post-9/11 rulings did any of the justices ever declare that they would not accept properly conducted commissions. It's also clear from the precedent that the closer those military trials look like federal civilian trials, the more likely they'll be upheld.

    So the "draft" rules for "indefinite" detainees is a good start. The rights and access contemplated for those men should be granted to all Guantanamo prisoners to make the tribunal process fairer and thus more legally and morally defensible for the 126 defendants, including Mohammed and Binalshibh, who are just waiting to be tried. If Congress won't allow terror detainees to come to the United States for federal trials, in other words, then the Obama administration should bring more of the essence of those federal trials down to Guantanamo Bay.


    READ MORE » What Now For Prisoners At Guantanamo Bay? - AOL News

    Kalamazoo Gazette 2010 top stories: President Barack Obama speaks at Kalamazoo ... - Kalamazoo Gazette - MLive.com

    Published: Friday, December 24, 2010, 8:00 PM ��� Updated: Friday, December 24, 2010, 9:01 PM

    The Kalamazoo area's top stories of 2010

    Kalamazoo Central High School usually has students as its main graduation speakers.

    Not this year.

    The headline speaker for the Class of 2010: President Barack Obama, in one of the first times a sitting president has addressed a high school commencement.

    K-Central students got the honor for winning the first White House Race to the Top High School Commencement Challenge, a national competition asking schools to document their efforts to prepare students for higher education.

    In their entry, K-Central students highlighted The Kalamazoo Promise and the school"s efforts to ensure students can take advantage of the scholarship program.

    Having Obama as a speaker meant K-Central had to change the date and location of its graduation ceremony, and admission to the event became one of the hottest tickets in town.

    More than 5,000 people packed University Arena on Western Michigan University"s campus on the night of June 7. It was a true cross-section of Kalamazoo, from community leaders to poor single moms who had a child graduating.

    The 280 graduates each got to shake Obama"s hand as they received their diploma. Obama also visited with students briefly as they were getting ready for the ceremony.

    SI"m here tonight because I think that America has a lot to learn from Kalamazoo Central about what makes for a successful school in this new century, Obama said in his 24-minute address.

    Students returned the love.

    SIt was awesome, just awesome, said graduate Thomas Groesbeck. SIt was just an incredible experience to have the president there.


    READ MORE » Kalamazoo Gazette 2010 top stories: President Barack Obama speaks at Kalamazoo ... - Kalamazoo Gazette - MLive.com

    Summary Box: Obama to press ahead with Fed pick - BusinessWeek

    NOT GIVING UP: President Barack Obama will resubmit the failed nomination of a Nobel prize-winning economist to the Federal Reserve, even though he faces even stronger opposition from the next Congress.

    SCUTTLED BY SENATE: Peter Diamond's nomination fizzled when the Senate adjourned Wednesday without acting on it. Senate Republicans had opposed the nomination of Diamond, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    STRUGGLE AHEAD: Obama faces an even tougher time getting the nomination approved in the new Congress that convenes in January. Republicans picked up six additional seats in the Senate.



    READ MORE » Summary Box: Obama to press ahead with Fed pick - BusinessWeek

    Chicago seen as likely 2012 Obama HQ - Chicago Breaking News - Tribune (blog)

    A key factor favoring Chicago's selection is the anti-Washington climate that has swept the country. Another is the insurgency candidacy anticipated from Obama's rivals, who are expected to make the case that the times are bad, the nation's capital is broken, Obama has been captured by Washington -- and they offer voters an alternative.

    Running the re-election effort out of Chicago wouldn't stop those arguments, but it could blunt them.

    One sign that the campaign may be based in Chicago is the planned return to the city of David Axelrod, the top strategist behind Obama's win in '08 and a White House senior adviser since. After the State of the Union address in late January, Axelrod is expected to come back to Chicago, possibly in February, and begin ratcheting up what's known as "the re-elect."

    A Chicago base would offer plenty of advantages: The city is loaded with longtime loyalists, many with fundraising muscle. It's within striking distance of battleground states Obama must court: Iowa, Ohio, Missouri, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan. It's far enough from Washington to avoid those unwelcome political consultants who, as one Democratic strategist put it, are "trying to get a piece of the ad money and always in your ear offering their two cents."

    The bottom line? "He will and must select Chicago," said American University political scientist James Thurber. "He needs to project an anti-Washington image and keep the campaign staff far away from the echo chamber in D.C."

    Potential drawbacks involve coordinating the president's moves and messages with top political advisers split between the Washington and a Chicago campaign shop. In 2008, Obama's anchors -- his wife and daughters -- were in Chicago, but now their home is the White House.

    Not that Obama himself would be a frequent flier to Chicago if his nerve center goes up there, since often he'd be on the road campaigning.

    Patti Solis Doyle, a Chicago native who for a time led Hillary Rodham Clinton's 2008 campaign and joined Obama's after Clinton's concession, said the city is a logical pick. "Chicago makes more sense than Washington. He's from Chicago, he still has his home in Chicago, and in terms of the staff, there are direct flights running almost every hour.

    "What Chicago offers is what it offered in '08: You can be more focused on the task at hand -- and the scuttlebutt and the buzz and the Washington talk is more background music, as opposed to being at the forefront."

    Some Democrats envision a skeletal staff starting work in the spring and a larger team in place in the summer or fall.

    The Obama campaign in 2008 had its primary offices in Chicago's Loop at 233 N. Michigan Ave. There aides worked on political matters, policy, finance, communications, scheduling, speechwriting, field operations, technology, new media, research and outreach to groups including labor, women, minorities, and gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people.

    Donna Brazile led Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign, which made a high-profile, midcourse correction in September 1999 by moving its headquarters from Washington's lobbyist-heavy K Street to Nashville's Church Street.

    Gore said he wanted to "get closer to the American people, closer to the grassroots and out of the Beltway and into the heartland."

    Brazile, asked about the choice awaiting Obama, said: "It's important to get the staff out of the Beltway chattering class. And it will force some reporters to cover the campaign and not the inside-the-Beltway noise."

    But even if Chicago wins, it may be some time before the campaign emerges publicly. With a large crop of Republican hopefuls and support yet to coalesce around one, Obama is expected to adopt a short-term strategy of looking, acting and sounding presidential -- not like a candidate.

    --Katherine Skiba


    READ MORE » Chicago seen as likely 2012 Obama HQ - Chicago Breaking News - Tribune (blog)

    Holiday Cheers for DADT Repeal, 9/11 Healthcare, and START, But It's Still the ... - Huffington Post (blog)

    It's good to end 2010 with some progressive victories to cheer about. As a card-carrying "professional liberal" who worked to elect Barack Obama and cheered his victory, I've written increasingly critically of President Obama's generally corporatist economic policies, his cave-in on a Reaganite tax cut bill, his weak financial reforms, his back-room deals to trade away a public option. The repeal of DADT, and the passage of the START treaty and the 9/11 healthcare bill haven't changed those views. But progressives have had far too few things to celebrate over the past several decades. And it's good for Democrats to come off like winners and let the Republicans be the whiners. So I'm happy to join the victory parade over these genuine accomplishments in the last week of the lame duck Congress.

    But, while I don't want to be the Grinch who stole Christmas, I also have to admit that there's a certain ambivalence in my joy at these wins which were purchased at a high price -- a victory for "starve the beast" Republicans and a cave-in by the Obama administration on tax cuts that will increase the deficit by nearly $900 billion and will likely increase the suffering of tens of millions of Americans who, as a result, will soon see their benefits cut and even Social Security and Medicare reduced.

    As Robert Reich so eloquently wrote in these pages:

    "The new tax deal embodies the essence of Reaganomics.

    It will not stimulate the economy.

    A disproportionate share of the $858 billion deal will go to people in the top 1 percent who spend only a fraction of what they earn and save the rest. Their savings are sent around the world to wherever they will earn the highest return.

    The only practical effect of adding $858 billion to the deficit will be to put more pressure on Democrats to reduce non-defense spending of all sorts, including Social Security and Medicare, as well as education and infrastructure.

    It is nothing short of Ronald Reagan's (and David Stockman's) notorious 'starve the beast' strategy."

    As important as the repeal of DADT and passage of the 9/11 healthcare bill are, these are still second tier issues that will directly impact only a relatively small number of Americans. In the end the biggest issues -- the one that will impact the future of all Americans -- is still the economy, stupid. And when it comes to the economy, President Obama's policies remain largely corporatist.

    Looking back on Obama's "cave in" on tax cuts for the rich, it may not have been a cave-in at all, but the result Obama may have wanted. With the economy stuck in neutral and unemployment at over 9.5%, it may well have been a conscious attempt to use Reaganite tax cuts for their minor stimulative effect, in the hope of improving his reelection prospects.

    President Obama has learned what a generation of Republican politicians from Reagan to Bush already knew -- if you give tax cuts to (almost) all Americans and ask nothing in return, most of them approve, at least for the moment. It's like a teacher giving a roomful of school kids free candy and ice cream. Never mind, of course, in the long run it will make them fat and rot their teeth and they'll come to expect it every day or start to misbehave.

    The Democratic legacy of FDR's New Deal and LBJ's Great Society was government regulation of the economy to mitigate economic crises caused by unregulated markets (e.g. Glass Steagall) and a social safety net (e.g. Social Security and Medicare) and progressive taxation to guarantee a minimal level of economic security. "New Democratic" presidents like Clinton and Obama have given political cover for undermining this legacy. Clinton helped undo the regulatory regime by repealing Glass Steagall and banning the government from regulating derivatives, which helped lead directly to the Great Recession.

    Obama has now adopted a policy of Reaganite tax cuts that will only lead to increasingly strident calls to weaken the social safety net. It's increasingly likely that Obama will make a "grand bargain" with conservatives to undermine Social Security and Medicare in the name of dealing with the deficit caused largely by the Great Recession, unaffordable tax cuts, and two wars.

    So yes, let's celebrate some wins this holiday season. But let's not let it blind us to the transcendent issues of our time -- how to stop the stagnation of middle class incomes, stimulate demand to grow the economy, and prevent Too Big To Fail banks (which have only grown larger since Obama's weak financial reforms) from blowing up the economy again. On DADT, 9/11 healthcare, and the START treaty, I'm glad that Barack Obama and not John McCain is president. But when it comes to broader economic issues, Barack Obama's policies may not be what we need to guarantee a secure future for the broad middle class.


    READ MORE » Holiday Cheers for DADT Repeal, 9/11 Healthcare, and START, But It's Still the ... - Huffington Post (blog)

    New tax law packed with obscure business tax cuts - The Associated Press

    WASHINGTON (AP) The massive new tax bill signed into law by President Barack Obama is filled with all kinds of holiday stocking stuffers for businesses: tax breaks for producing TV shows, grants for putting up windmills, rum subsidies for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

    There is even a tax break for people who buy race horses.

    Millions of homeowners, however, might feel like they got a lump of coal. Homeowners who don't itemize their deductions will lose a tax break for paying local property taxes.

    The business tax breaks are part of sweeping legislation that extends Bush era tax cuts for families at every income level through 2012. Obama signed the $858 billion measure a week ago. It also provides a new payroll tax cut for wage earners and extends jobless benefits to the long-term unemployed.

    Most of the business tax breaks about 50 in all are part of a package that expires each year, creating uncertainty for tax planners but lots of business for lobbyists. Many of these tax breaks have been around for years but expired at the end of 2009 because lawmakers couldn't agree how to pay for them.

    The new law extends most of them through 2011, some through 2012. They will be paid for with borrowed money.

    Nearly 1,300 businesses and trade groups formed a coalition urging Congress to extend the business tax breaks. Others lobbied for specific provisions, including a generous tax credit for research and development and subsidies to produce alternative energy.

    There is a generous tax break for banks and insurance companies that invest overseas, a tax credit for railroad track maintenance, more generous write-offs for upgrading motorsport race tracks, and increased deductions for businesses that donate books and computers to public schools and libraries.

    Many of the tax breaks are designed to encourage economic activity. But passing them each year at the last minute, or skipping a year and passing them retroactively, isn't terribly efficient, said Clint Stretch, a tax expert at Deloitte Tax LLP.

    "It gives it a lot of dignity to call it a 'system,' " Stretch said.

    Every year, taxpayers risk losing their favorite tax breaks, if they are not renewed. That's what happened to millions of homeowners. For 2008 and 2009, homeowners who didn't itemize their deductions were able to get an extra deduction on top of the standard deduction for paying local property taxes. Individuals could reduce their taxable income by as much as $500, couples could cut theirs by $1,000.

    The provision, which has saved homeowners about $1.6 billion a year, expired for 2010 and was left out of the new tax law.

    "A lot of Americans don't make so much money that they itemize their tax returns. But those same Americans own property," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who sponsored the original tax break. "It seems to me that they, too, should have the ability to deduct it. It's a matter of equity."

    Taxpayers who itemize will continue to be able to deduct local property taxes. About two-thirds of tax filers don't itemize.

    Among the provisions in the new law:

    A tax break that allows profitable companies to write off large capital expenditures immediately rather than over time giving some companies huge tax shelters.

    The tax break, known as bonus depreciation, benefits automakers, utilities, heavy equipment makers like Caterpillar Inc., and John Deere, air freight companies like Fedex Corp., and wireless companies like Verizon and AT&T, said Anne Mathias, director of research for the Washington Research Group, which provides research to institutional and corporate investors. It will save companies nearly $21 billion over the next decade.

    "It helps companies that use expensive capital equipment, that spend a lot of money," Mathias said. "It also helps places where the economy is growing, like wireless infrastructure, because there is a pretty big wireless build out right now."

    The tax break is also available to people who buy race horses and farmers who buy cattle for breeding or dairy, according to a depreciation list produced by the Internal Revenue Service.

    An exemption that allows banks, insurance companies and other financial firms to shield foreign profits from being taxed by the U.S. through 2011. Cost: $9.2 billion.

    The tax break is important to major multinational banks and financial firms, such as Citigroup, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, and to the financing operations of other international companies, Mathias said.

    A tax credit for research and development, benefiting a wide range of industries, including pharmaceutical and high tech companies. The law extends the tax credit through 2011, at a cost of $13.3 billion.

    "The House and the Senate are in the holiday spirit and giving US companies a present of $13 billion in potential R&D Tax Credits!" says a press release by Braithwaite Global Inc., a firm that advises companies on applying for research tax credits.

    Increased tax rebates to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands from a tax on rum imported into the United States. The U.S. imposes a $13.50 per proof-gallon tax on imported rum, and sends most of the proceeds to the two U.S. territories.

    Previously, the rebate was $10.50 a gallon. The new law extends a more generous rebate of $13.25 a gallon through 2011. Cost: $262 million.

    Extends a grant program for the production of wind, solar and other renewable energy through 2011. Cost: $3 billion.

    "This is a great holiday present for the 85,000 American workers in the wind energy industry, tens of thousands of whom will now be able to get back to work in a sector that has been a bright spot in the recession so far," Denise Bode, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association, said in a statement.

    Extends a 50 percent tax credit for expenses related to railroad track maintenance through 2011. Cost $331 million.

    Enhanced deductions for companies that donate food to the needy, books to public schools or computers to public libraries, through 2011. Cost: $537 million.

    A tax break that allows TV and movie productions to more quickly write off expenses, extended through 2011. Sexually explicit productions are ineligible. Cost: $101 million.


    READ MORE » New tax law packed with obscure business tax cuts - The Associated Press

    Obamas to spend quiet Christmas in Hawaii - The Associated Press

    HONOLULU (AP) President Barack Obama and his family plan to spend a quiet Christmas at their oceanfront Hawaiian vacation home, with hopes that outside events don't interrupt their holiday.

    A year ago, the president's Christmas was disrupted by the attempted bombing of a plane bound for Detroit, an incident that consumed the rest of Obama's vacation. This year, the president has his sights set on a more relaxing holiday after a volatile year and a frenzied lame-duck legislative session.

    The president is staying at a luxurious rented home on Kailua Bay with wife Michelle, daughters Malia and Sasha, and dog Bo. Obama took his daughters on a Christmas Eve trip to Pyramid Rock Beach, a favorite local destination of the first family.

    Mrs. Obama skipped the beach so she could give some lucky children a Christmas surprise. The first lady answered calls for the "Tracking Santa" program, a Christmas tradition run by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). With help from NORAD's Santa Route Schedule, Mrs. Obama was able to tell children Santa's whereabouts as he made his Christmas Eve rounds.

    The Obamas will spend Christmas Day with the president's sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, and her family. They live on Oahu, the island where Obama was born and mostly grew up. Several of Obama's childhood friends are also in town, along with family friends from Chicago.

    On the first family's Christmas Day menu: steak, roasted potatoes, green beans and pie.

    Last Christmas, the president and first lady surprised troops stationed at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, greeting service members during their holiday dinner. White House officials wouldn't say whether Obama planned to visit the troops again this Christmas.

    The base is a frequent stop for Obama during his Hawaiian vacations. He often starts his day with a morning workout at the base gym, and returned there Thursday afternoon for a round of golf.

    The president has no public events planned during his vacation, though he is receiving daily briefings. He is also beginning work on January's State of the Union address, and evaluating a staff review headed by interim chief of staff Pete Rouse.

    Obama arrived in Hawaii on a high note, having secured victories on legislative priorities: ratification of a nuclear arms treaty with Russia and the repeal of the military's ban on gay service members. He also compromised with Republicans to extend tax cuts for all income earners, a deal that angered some liberals but won him rare bipartisan support.

    Awaiting Obama in 2011 is an economy still struggling to achieve steady growth, a divided Congress and a host of Republicans ready to run for his job in the 2012 election.

    The Obamas are expected to return to Washington Jan. 2.


    READ MORE » Obamas to spend quiet Christmas in Hawaii - The Associated Press

    Biden says public support for gay marriage 'inevitable' - MiamiHerald.com

    Attitudes toward same-sex marriage are "evolving," and a national consensus for gay marriage is inevitable, Vice President Joe Biden said Friday.

    Biden gave a somewhat more optimistic view than President Barack Obama, who earlier this week told reporters: "I think this is something that we're going to debate and I personally am going to continue to wrestle with, going forward."

    Friday, Biden cited the administration's successful push to repeal the military's 17-year-old "don't ask don't tell" policy toward gays as a sign of the change in public attitudes. He saw the trend as leading to support of same-sex marriage.

    "I think the country's evolving," he said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America," "and I think there's an inevitability for a national consensus on gay marriage. That is my view. But this is the president's policy, but it is evolving. I think the country's evolving."

    He discussed the change in military attitudes and recalled how Obama told military officials to prepare to end the "don't ask don't tell" policy. "I think the same thing is happening across the country with regard to the issue of marriage," he said.

    Congress approved overturning the "don't ask, don't tell" policy last week with bipartisan support, and Obama signed the legislation Wednesday. The Pentagon is now studying how to implement the policy, which could take several months.

    The Defense Department earlier this month reported that in an eight-month study of more than 115,000 military personnel, 70 percent said ending the ban on gays serving openly would have a positive or neutral effect.

    Combat unit personnel were more skeptical, with 58 percent of Marines and 48 percent of Army respondents saying that ending the ban would have negative consequences. And a sizable minority said repeal could affect morale and training and whether they would stay in the military. Marines voiced the loudest opposition, the survey found.

    After the survey's release, a Pew Research Center poll of the American public found 59 percent of the public favored allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly, with 23 percent opposed, down 4 percentage points from the previous month. Opposition has dropped 9 percentage points since March 2009, just after Obama took office.

    The poll was conducted Dec. 1-5. Total survey sample was 1,500 people, and margin of error was plus or minus 3 percentage points.

    Finding consensus on gay marriage could take some time, despite Biden's optimism.

    A Pew survey released in October, based on two polls taken over several months, found that 48 percent opposed allowing gays and lesbians to legally marry, while 42 percent were in favor. Still, a Pew analysis noted, "for the first time in 15 years, fewer than half oppose same-sex marriage."

    About 6,500 people were surveyed. The margin of error is plus or minus 1.5 percentage points.

    Pew also found "the shift in opinion on same-sex marriage has been broad-based, occurring across many demographic, political and religious groups.

    "Notably, pluralities of white mainline Protestants and white Catholics now favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally - the first time this has occurred in Pew Research Center surveys."

    Obama himself was circumspect at his news conference Wednesday when asked about same sex marriage.

    "At this point, what I've said is, is that my baseline is a strong civil union that provides them the protections and the legal rights that married couples have," Obama said. "And I think that's the right thing to do."

    "But I recognize that, from their perspective, that's not enough," he added.


    READ MORE » Biden says public support for gay marriage 'inevitable' - MiamiHerald.com

    Media Celebrates, Calls Obama the SComeback Kid - Big Journalism

    It was a press conference pep rally:�Barack Obama held a press conference the other afternoon after Don"t Ask, Don"t Tell was repealed and the liberal Senate passed START Treaty and the 9-11 Emergency Responder"s Bill.

    The first reporter Caren Bohan from Reuters praised Barack Obama as�SThe Comeback Kid.


    It was a celebration.

    Of course, the media congratulated Obama for extending the Bush tax cuts.


    Even though not that long ago Obama blamed the Great Recession on those same Bush tax cuts.

    But, don"t expect the media to report this. It"s not on the agenda.

    Once again, Barack Obama promised that his singular focus over the next two years will be the economy.
    Yeah, right. We"ve heard that one before.

    More Obama just said that the DREAM Act will secure the border. And, if Americans knew these kids, Sand they probably do, they would pass this amnesty bill.

    If I knew these kids I"d call ICE.

    Cross-posted from Gateway Pundit.

    15182824 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbigjournalism.com%2Fjhoft%2F2010%2F12%2F24%2Fmedia-celebrates-calls-obama-the-comeback-kid%2FMedia+Celebrates%2C+Calls+Obama+the+%22Comeback+Kid%222010-12-24+20%3A00%3A11Jim+Hofthttp%3A%2F%2Fbigjournalism.com%2F%3Fp%3D151828

    Same day, same belief: I don't buy one single damn thing MSM or Obama says. If they say it, think the opposite immediately.

    Blaming the recession on Tax cuts is like blaming my grocer for me burning my steak last night.

    Kenya Slim as the Comeback Kid?
    Well, it worked for Billy Jeff.

    But to paraphrase a famous line "He is certainly not Billy Jeff"

    I don't know what to say.
    A straight line like the title, just gives unlimited possibilities to what could be said about THE MOST INCOMPETANT PRESIDENT EVER.

    The media is trying to put lipstick on a pig. But no matter how pretty they make it, it's still just a damned pig!

    The MSM writes more fiction than the Fantasy Section at Books-A-Million!

    Pretty much every professional body has some kind of governing body, the Bar Assocaition for lawyers, the Automotive Service Excellence for mechanicssomething that provides the public with some assurance of quality. Clearly nothing exists for the media.

    "Come back kid???"

    He has to have been something to begin with before he can come back to it.

    So far his list of "accomplishments" reads like a Leninist checklist for bringing down the west.

    Defending Obama is like defending Palestine. Lost causes, and wrongboth of them.

    You can paint the old dog any color you like he's still Obalma. You think Americans are going to forget the last two years? Well hell ya they will- but it takes time. 25 some yrs before Carter was considered "the best president" by 33% of the poll (I choose to believe that these were people who were born after Carter), it took 6 years before 9/11 was forgotten and talk of war crimes against the Bush Administration started to spring up. Hopefully it'll take more then 2 years to forget this puke. Once he's safely out of office we can all have fond memorys of all the jobs he created, the earth he saved, the military opertunities he gave to the gays, the way he saved the healthcare system

    Senate Democrats poised for a power grab.
    http://www.redstate.com/brian_d/2010/12/23/senate...

    ''A genuine leader is not a searcher for consensus but a molder of consensus." Martin Luther King, Jr.

    This is the big media basically bailing water for Obama, as the kickoff to the 2012 campaign. To all but the truest of True Believers on the left in the press, what matters for the next two years isn't so much what gets passed or adhering to core beliefs, but doing whatever's needed to get Obama re-elected.

    So if it takes convincing swing voters that the Bush tax cut renewal was a victory for Obama, even though he and they were totally opposed to them two months ago, so be it. By the summer of 2012, the media may be hailing as a major success Obama's acquiescing to Republicans on the dismantling of ObamaCare�, if that's what it will take to get him four more years in office.

    How about calling him "the go home kid"? But where is his home. ..? Africa?he avoids that home as much as he avoids Chicagolet's just leave him in Hawaii and sell the islands to China for what Obama has borrowed from them! He will be real comfortable with his Communist buddies!

    "Comeback kid" my rear. It's nothing more than Desperation from the media to save a drowning administration.and whats left of their tattered "reputations".

    Their shameless bias would be embarrassing to a normal person but one needs a conscience to be embarrassed.

    For a long time now, we have been in a news blackout by so-called "Mainstream Media"; no different than what socialist and communist countries suffered under. They are doing whatever they can to keep BHO in a good light or to bolster his popularity and re-election chances. It is a formidable,united front. Other than boycotting them and the commercial sponsors, what can we do to put them out of business? They and the left are ruining our great people and country.

    Obama's the 'Comeback Kid' like I'm Bronco Billy.
    The MBM doing their level best to shape shift, spin, and distort for the terminally misinformed.
    The 'watchdog' (lapdog) 4th estate gets coal in their stockings..

    The bar is very low when extended is translated into comeback extensions of Bush cuts, ethanol, green tax "investment", and unemployment, all with a super majority, now equals a comeback.

    Stop insulting pigs, Larry :-)
    'boma cain't help it he's a trained prevaricator

    I'm not buyin' what they're sellin'. I hereby declare that this half A$$ sh1t for brains pres is officially in the lame duck mode. If the media wants to be with him in la-la land-fine the rest of us will stick with reality.

    Excuse me Mr. President "Comeback"?

    The 2010 election clearly told you "Go away" and "Stay away".

    We will work on clarifying this for you in the coming months.

    Merry whatever you celebrate,
    The American people

    Comeback? LOL. The only reason anything has been done in the last month is because the "Lame Dick" congress and some RHINOS who were booted had their panties in a bind. The Congress had to spit in our faces one last time.

    Don't feed the Troll he is a Canadian. The only thing they are known for is Crappy bacon, Hockey and using our military to protect them so they can crow about a crappy health care system we pay for. Canada sucks that's why so many are down here now LOL.

    I think everyone needs to wake up.

    BHO and the Democrats were totally rebuked on Nov. 2nd suffering the biggest congressional losses since 1948.

    They came back in a lame duck Congress and.
    1. Accused the Republicans of being heartless for arguing against a 13 month extension of unemployment benefits?
    2. Stopped collecting Social Security taxes for a year, allowing the Social Security deficit toa what the hell is another 100billion in debt? All so BHO could be claiming to help the little guy, by taking the money from his right pocket and placing it in his left.
    3. Only extended the Bush tax cuts for two years..so noone can make a long range plan
    4. For the first time ever passed an international treaty in a lame duck session, denying the voter's new choices the chance to vote the people's mind.
    4. Allowed homosexuals to join the military and shower with teenagers.

    I didn't hear one Republican say: 13 months? What happened to recovery summer? Now you are telling the unemployed there won't be any jobs in 2011? Goddamn the RINO's. I can't believe how they rolled over. Will someone stand up and say itever since 2006 the Democrats have instituted the worst economic policy in US history. It is time to stop it.
    TEAPARTY NOW

    Comeback Kid? Possibly. Lets add up wins and losses for the Republicans and Obama

    -Dream Act fails Rw Ol
    -Omibus Bill fails Rw Ol
    -Don't Ask repeal Rl Ow
    -Card Check fails Rw Ol
    -Cap & Trade fails Rw Ol
    -Start Treaty Passes Rl- Ow
    -9/.11 Responders pass Rw Ow
    -Continuing Resolution pass Rw Ow
    -Extension Bush Tax Cuts Rw Owl
    -Estate Tax Lowered Rw Ol
    -Unemployment Extension Rl Ow

    On the whole, the President won key victories in things he wanted. Republicans, due to the RINO's, did not hold the line on certain key issues, but the biggest disappointment was passage of the Start Treaty. This Lameduck Session was very productive despite the repudiation of the Dim's Leftist agenda in the November election.

    However, in terms of Executive Agencies, the Republicans will face a severe challenge to curb their power.

    FCC new regulations on the Internet this is beyond their mandate and needs to be overturned.
    EPA new regulations on carbon emissions costs for power companies, industry and customers will skyrocket need to be repealed.

    The new Congress will have to work with the President where it can, but the Left wing agenda is finished. The Republicans need to repeal the parts of ObamaCare where they can. They will need to curb the powers of the Executive Agencies. The problem the Republicans have is they don't have the numbers to override Obama's veto.

    The MSM leans very sharply to the left, and they do provide cover to the Marxist White House.

    Here is a repost I made nearly a year ago

    When you have virtually the entire media in the tank for progressivism that is no coincidence. It is no secret to anyone here the press is the White House Propanda Ministry, virtually in goose step with Minister Fibbs er GibbsTheir mission, which they have enthuastcally chosen to accept is to provide Obama with political cover for the fundamental transformation of America ..

    If anyone in this country is unaware the MSM is now the fifth column *, they are dangerously naive..

    * "The term originated with a 1936 radio address by Emilio Mola, a Nationalist General during the 193639 Spanish Civil War. Who, besieging Madrid with four columns from the outside, broadcast a message where he boasted of having a Sfifth column within as his army approached Madrid,that the four columns of his forces outside the city would be supported by his supporters inside the city, intent on undermining the Republican government from within (see Siege of Madrid)."

    I predict that Obama will be smaller than advertised, just like he was in the first two years.
    It's hard to buy the hype when there has been so little to show for it.

    You must be logged in to post a comment.


    READ MORE » Media Celebrates, Calls Obama the SComeback Kid - Big Journalism

    Obama does a valiant Santa Claus - Reuters India

    Fri Dec 24, 2010 4:16pm IST

    (C. Uday Bhaskar is a New Delhi-based strategic analyst. The views expressed in this column are his own and do not represent those of Reuters).

    In the run-up to Christmas, U.S. President Barack Obama has notched up two significant legislative victories and has donned the metaphoric Santa Claus coat as he brings long-awaited gifts to two groups within and beyond the United States.

    The first is the gay constituency in the U.S. military who will no longer have to live in a twilight legal zone and the second is the global arms control fraternity that will welcome the ratification by the U.S. Senate of the New START treaty.

    On Dec 22, President Obama signed a path-breaking law that would end the ostracism and related legal ambiguity that surrounded the gay community in the U.S. military.

    While the Clinton administration had introduced an uneasy modus vivendi -- the "don't ask, don't tell" policy -- gay personnel in the U.S. military were still in violation of the law and the courageous Obama legislation will be welcomed by the liberal spectrum.

    Sexual preferences and orientation are matters of personal choice and as long as this does not impinge on the professionalism that military service demands, being gay should not be seen as a negative attribute. Thousands of gay personnel -- many who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan -- will be elated with this Obama initiative.

    Yes, the implementation will be slow and some opposition will be encountered -- the outburst of the U.S. Marine Commandant being case in point. But on balance, this is a significant victory for the Obama administration and the nature of the debate on this issue offers instructive insights into the prevailing conservative-liberal divide in the U.S. polity and the manner in which a determined executive can forge reasonable bipartisan support.

    India is still very reticent about homosexuality and the issue is rarely brought into the public domain. Laws on the subject go back to 1860 and although this sexual orientation was decriminalised in 2009, gay rights have little or no traction within the Indian military.

    The current lame-duck U.S. legislature was able to notch up another major vote on Dec 22 when the Senate approved the New START nuclear arms control treaty by a vote of 71 to 26.

    As many as 13 Republican Senators supported the Democrats and this vote will be a much needed shot-in-the-arm for a beleaguered Obama administration, even as the global community will welcome this U.S.-Russia nuclear arms control breakthrough.

    Despite President Reagan's historic agreement with Soviet President Gorbachev over intermediate range missiles (the INF Treaty of 1987) which paved the way for the end of the Cold War and the first START (strategic arms reduction treaty), the Republican Party has been reluctant to support any further cuts to the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

    It was the same compulsion that saw a major shift in U.S. nuclear policy in the Clinton-Bush transition when the U.S. went slow over the CTBT and nuclear disarmament receded even further into the background.

    To President Obama's credit, he invigorated the moribund arms control-disarmament policies that he had inherited and over the last two years has made slow but commendable progress. The Dec 22 U.S. Senate vote will inject much needed legislative endorsement to the Obama policies and hopefully the major powers led by this latest U.S.-Russia initiative will be able to revive the stalled arms control disarmament deliberations in a meaningful manner.

    New START, which now pegs the long-range strategic warheads to 1,550 in the U.S. and Russian arsenals, was preceded by the Moscow Treaty (2002) that had a 2,200 warhead benchmark, which in turn was derived from the original 1991 START that had set the ceiling at 6,000 warheads. Thus in two decades, the major nuclear arsenals are mandated to shrink to a quarter of their post Cold War levels but the verification process is still opaque. There is little veracity about the actual number of nuclear weapons in the world and a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy is at play here.

    An element of 'Alice in Wonderland' is embedded here a la the cat and the smile. In that multi-layered story, at a certain point, the cat begins to smile and the smile gets bigger and bigger till a point is reached when the cat disappears and the smile remains.


    READ MORE » Obama does a valiant Santa Claus - Reuters India

    Obama says war effort is 'on track' - Dallas Morning News

    WASHINGTON The review of the administration's Afghanistan strategy released Thursday offered a strikingly mixed assessment of the two-pronged war effort: significant military progress against the Taliban, but lagging Afghan government capacity to capitalize on those gains.

    President Barack Obama said Thursday that the war effort was "on track" to meet the goals he set a year ago disrupting and ultimately defeating al-Qaeda, halting Taliban momentum and strengthening Afghanistan's ability to fight the insurgents and to "start reducing our forces next July."

    "This continues to be a difficult endeavor," Obama said. In many places, "the gains we've made are fragile and reversible," he said, making particular reference to an "urgent need for political and economic progress in Afghanistan" to match security successes.

    In adopting a strategy last year that sent 30,000 additional U.S. troops and more than a thousand diplomats and aid experts to an unpopular war, Obama largely rejected a more focused counterterrorism option, centered on Special Operations Forces missions and drone attacks against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, put forward by Vice President Joe Biden and others.

    Recalling a similar debate over U.S. operations in Iraq, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said that those arguing for limits "were wrong in Iraq, and they are wrong here. ... I've seen this movie before an argument that you should just try to kill bad guys and use drones, then we can succeed. We can't succeed that way."

    Obama, McCain said, "is very honest and forthright in the assessments he provides Congress and the American people. He has never said this is going to be easy."

    In a prepared statement, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., described the review as "welcome evidence of progress in key parts of Afghanistan."

    But he added that "our strategy and resources must match our objectives and our core mission, which is not building a perfect state, but defeating al-Qaeda and denying it and its partners a secure base from which to launch attacks on the United States and its allies."

    The review concluded that significant gains have been made against al-Qaeda, with missile attacks by U.S. drones on their sanctuaries in Pakistan eliminating a number of insurgent leaders. But the Pakistani military, despite stepped-up efforts in tribal regions near its border with Afghanistan, has continued to resist U.S. entreaties to take more aggressive action.

    "Progress has not come fast enough," Obama said, "so we will continue to insist to Pakistani leaders that terrorist safe havens within their borders must be dealt with."

    Administration officials said they planned to increase attacks on al-Qaeda and Taliban insurgents across the Afghan border to help offset the Pakistani government's continued refusal to move against the al-Qaeda leadership and their extremist allies, especially the Haqqani network.

    From havens in Pakistan's North Waziristan region, those groups have carried out deadly assaults against U.S. troops and have plotted attacks against the West, officials say.

    Neither Obama nor a five-page written summary of the review distributed by the White House presented specifics or data to back up its conclusions that al-Qaeda has been significantly damaged and Taliban momentum had been "arrested" in much of Afghanistan "and reversed in some key areas." Nor did they indicate any specific policy changes to increase pressure on either the Afghan or Pakistani governments.

    "A five-page document to deal with one of the most complex wars in history? It's not quite a fortune cookie, but it is not a strategic review either," said Anthony Cordesman, a national security expert at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Cordesman, who backs the U.S. war in Afghanistan, said a report so lacking in detail could fuel war skepticism.

    "There is a risk here that is borne out in public opinion polls. We are not making a case for war," he said. "The message far too often is 'Trust me.' "

    " Obama pledged a year ago to begin withdrawing U.S. troops in July 2011, a date that he and his aides appear determined to meet with at least token withdrawals.

    But Thursday's assessment sheds no light on the size or pace of troop withdrawals.

    The Washington Post, The New York Times, McClatchy Newspapers


    READ MORE » Obama says war effort is 'on track' - Dallas Morning News
     
    © 2010 Barack Obama Fanclub Friend Link: